top of page

Fact Check: Is Smithtown being turned into Long Islands waste hub




Fact-Check: Is Smithtown Being Turned into Long Island’s Waste Hub?


Comparing the Smithtown Democratic Committee’s Opposition to the R.A.M.S. Plan


Smithtown residents are in a heated debate over a proposed freight rail yard that could impact zoning, property values, and waste management on Long Island. The Smithtown Democratic Committee (SDC) has issued a statement opposing the project, citing environmental risks and concerns about industrial expansion. However, opposition alone does not solve the growing Long Island waste crisis.


At the same time, Carlson Corp and the R.A.M.S. framework are focused on creating an equitable, technology-driven solution for waste tracking and governance. Does this mean turning Smithtown into a waste hub? No. The goal is to balance responsibility across Long Island, ensuring that no one town becomes a dumping ground.


So, how does this opposition compare to the Regional Asset Management System (R.A.M.S.) plan? Let’s break it down.


Key Comparison: Opposition vs. Solutions-Based Thinking


Factor Smithtown Democratic Committee R.A.M.S. & Carlson Plan

View on Rail Freight Opposes freight yard due to environmental & community concerns. Supports data-driven evaluation. Rail could be useful if regulated properly.

Approach to Waste Crisis Focuses on stopping this project but offers no alternative solution. Proposes AI-driven tracking, recycling improvements, and waste logistics.

Environmental Strategy Warns of air pollution and water contamination but does not offer a mitigation plan. Seeks to optimize waste flows while monitoring pollution with AI.

Transparency & Public Involvement Voices opposition but lacks structured public engagement. Proposes AI dashboards for real-time tracking & community feedback.

Zoning & Land Use Concerned about zoning changes but doesn’t propose long-term solutions. Advocates for balanced zoning with environmental oversight.


Does Carlson Want to Turn Smithtown Into a Waste Hub?


🚨 No. The R.A.M.S. framework explicitly rejects the idea of turning Smithtown—or any single town—into Long Island’s waste hub.


📌 Instead, it advocates for fair, distributed waste management across multiple municipalities so that no one community is unfairly burdened.


📌 Smithtown should not bear the weight of Long Island’s entire waste system—but that also means Smithtown needs a say in how its waste is managed rather than just opposing projects without alternatives.


📌 R.A.M.S. would track, analyze, and correct imbalances in waste distribution, preventing environmental injustice while ensuring better sustainability practices.


📌 Carlson Corp has repeatedly stated that it will not handle hazardous materials, chemicals, or petroleum products—a key distinction that many opponents overlook.


Does Smithtown Need Multiple $30-50M Waste Facilities?


Smithtown has about 110,000 residents, which raises a major question: Does it make sense for a town of this size to host multiple large-scale industrial waste facilities?

• 📌 Long Island already exports 90% of its waste—is Smithtown being forced to take on more than its fair share?

• 📌 Rail freight can reduce trucking pollution, but uncontrolled expansion could make Smithtown an industrial hub.

• 📌 The town must evaluate financial, environmental, and zoning impacts before approving multiple sites.


🚨 The R.A.M.S. system is designed to prevent waste hubs from forming in any single community. Instead, it seeks to balance responsibility across towns based on data-driven insights.


The Key Problem: No Clear Alternative From Opponents


The SDC letter raises important concerns, but it lacks a real solution. Simply blocking industrial projects without proposing an alternative will not fix Long Island’s worsening waste crisis. Without a strategic plan, waste disposal will become more expensive, and towns may lose control of their own waste decisions.


R.A.M.S. Provides a Smarter Path Forward


The R.A.M.S. framework does not blindly support or oppose the rail yard—it analyzes its role within a sustainable, fair waste management system.


Ensures transparency by tracking waste flows and facility operations.

Uses AI to prevent overburdening specific communities with industrial projects.

Educates the public through tools like Toby the App, helping residents make informed decisions.


Final Verdict: What Should Happen Next?


🚨 Smithtown should NOT approve the freight rail yard without full transparency and community oversight.

🚨 A structured, data-driven waste plan must be created—not just opposition without alternatives.

🚨 Public involvement should be enhanced through AI dashboards, live data tracking, and governance tools.

🚨 The region must move toward waste equity, preventing any town from becoming a dumping ground.


📢 Have Your Say: Join the Conversation


What do YOU think about Smithtown’s role in Long Island’s waste crisis? Should we be pushing for smarter, technology-driven solutions instead of just opposing new projects? Drop a comment below and share your thoughts.


For more in-depth analysis and fact-checking on Smithtown waste policies, visit The Real Smithtown News.






 
 
 

Bình luận


bottom of page